User talk:92.14.200.97

July 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Billy Tipton. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.   Zudo (talk • contribs) 16:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

"Biologically female" on Billy Tipton, Charley Parkhurst, etc.
Hello! I'm Roxy.

It looks like you've been changing several instances of the term assigned female at birth to alternatives like "biologically female" or simply "female". This is a relatively controversial change, and one you probably should seek consensus for first.

Your personal opinion about whether sex assignment exists as a distinct concept from sex is not especially relevant, and constitutes original research. The term "assigned [male / female] at birth" appears in several thousand scholarly papers and appears generally agreed upon to be an appropriate way to describe a person's sex. As such, it seems to adhere to the neutral point of view.

Best wishes, RoxySaunders (talk · contribs) 02:34, 1 August 2021 (UTC)