User talk:92.15.144.174

Murthy and wealth
I've mentioned your edit here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Akshata_Murty#Personal_wealth_ranking please join the discussion. CT55555 (talk) 14:57, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Stanley Johnson (writer), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:24, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Cameron Dewe. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Talk:Countess of Chester Hospital baby deaths have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. WikiProject banners are placed on talk pages because those articles are assessed to be of interest to the WikiProjects concerned. Removing the banners deprives a WikiProject of oversight of the quality of an article that is within its scope. Just because a crime has not yet been proven in this case does not mean it is not crime-related. Clearly the Police think the deaths are crime related because charges have been laid against a person. That there is reasonable cause to suspect a crime has occurred is sufficient for WikiProject Crime to be interested in this article. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 11:10, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bill Cosby in advertising without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 18:37, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Have you considered making an account?
Hi, I've noticed you working across various political articles, and you seem to be doing some good work. Have you considered creating an account? There's a few benefits, which you can see here: WP:ACCOUNT. Can I assume is also you? — Czello 15:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * That is indeed me as well! Easy to tell from the edit history. Thank you for the compliment, but I haven't considered creating an account as of now. That could change in the future, however. --92.15.144.174 (talk) 15:55, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi there! Thanks for your contributions to Premiership of Rishi Sunak. I suggest that you seriously consider creating an account, as not only does it hide your IP address (which can be used to geolocate you) but you'll also gain access to additional privileges both immediately and over time such as translation tools, the Wikipedia Library, editing protected and controversial pages, and more. Thank you again for your contributions!  Invading Invader  (userpage, talk) 00:19, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the positive feedback! And I shall definitely consider it. --92.15.144.174 (talk) 00:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Premiership of Rishi Sunak. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 17:02, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Question
Hi! You might be interested in the articles in this template. Do you agree that the "list of living spouses" should be removed from them? Surtsicna (talk) 10:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes I agree they should be, for the same reasons as the living former prime ministers. --92.15.144.174 (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2010 Labour Party leadership election (UK)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:54, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Galleries
Please don't remove the galleries from either the US President or US Vice President page. A discussion is taking place about it. Also, you shouldn't be deleting other editors or IPs comments on Surtsicna's talkpage. That's for him to decide, not you. GoodDay (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2022 (UTC)