User talk:92.20.206.210

Spamming predatory publisher and corporate websites
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Jytdog (talk) 21:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Please explain what exactly in my contribution you classify as spam. I've made several changes in one go and I strongly believe that at least some of them improved the article. You deleted them all - this is counterproductive and doesn't help to improve Wikipedia. 92.20.206.210 (talk) 21:26, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * What is unclear about "predatory publisher and corporate websites"? I am looking for acceptable refs for retrotrope. Jytdog (talk) 21:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Please add them when you found them. Meanwhile, I will revert to my editing and remove the links to the corporate websites. BTW, the Concert Pharmaceuticals trial was discontinued, we should clean that paragraph. 92.20.206.210 (talk) 21:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for good shortening of the paragraph about Retrotope! 92.20.206.210 (talk) 21:55, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I am seeking to have this IP indefinitely blocked and will be seeking to blacklist the juniper website. Predatory publishers have no place, whatsoever, anywhere in WP. You are a spammer. Jytdog (talk) 22:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Please apologise for personal abuse. What exactly is wrong with this juniper review? It lists many of the compounds that are the subject of this wiki article.92.20.206.210 (talk) 22:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * You either know what a "predatory publisher" is or you don't. If you don't know, you didn't take me seriously enough to ask or to even google it.  You have wasted my time.  Jytdog (talk) 22:10, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Edit war warning
Your recent editing history at Deuterated drug shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 21:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)