User talk:92.233.224.159

September 2021
Hello, I'm Jack Frost. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Progressive stack—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Jack Frost (talk) 10:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Progressive stack. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jack Frost (talk) 10:04, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

February 2022

 * Please note that both Black and black are acceptable when referring to people, per the Manual of Style. Before making a sweeping change to the variety of English used in an article, please get consensus at the talk page (in this case, Talk:Arthur Ashe). Also, do not change direct quotations. The capitalization of a quotation must be preserved. —C.Fred (talk) 13:45, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Juliet Stevenson. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 18:37, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 13:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of women executed in the United States since 1976, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  always forever  (talk) 09:02, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of women executed in the United States since 1976. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Inexpiable (talk) 12:54, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of women executed in the United States since 1976, you may be blocked from editing. --rchard2scout (talk) 13:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of women executed in the United States since 1976. Inexpiable (talk) 19:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)