User talk:92.244.246.174

December 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Racism in the Soviet Union, you may be blocked from editing.  Asension   (talk) 00:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

THE ABOVE WARNING HAS BEEN RETRACTED BY ME.  Asension   (talk) 01:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

'''If you reverted those edits out of good faith, please state your reason here. Otherwise your actions will be considered as vandalism and reverted.'''  Asension   (talk) 00:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I reverted sock edits by User:Accopulocrat editing as an ip this user routinely misrepresents sources. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anfal_genocide&diff=927213628&oldid=927120307


 * I checked the link you sent, which the other editor stated “(Reverting sock edits by User:Accopulocrat editing as an IP. This user routinely misrepresents sources. I don't see anything too egregious in these edits, but I would suggest double-checking all of his sources before restoring any of this content. I do not see that the term "Kurdish Holocaust" is commonly found in RS.)”. Have you double-checked their edits to make sure their facts are incorrect before you reverted their edits? Or did you just reverted their edits just because they had unconstructive edits in the past?  Asension   (talk) 00:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I undid all the edits because routinely misrepresents sources shows they are trying to make up things, that are not in the edits they make so yes because he had unconstructive edits in the past. yes I did check one of them and it was not right.


 * I see. If only one of their edits is incorrect, you should only revert that specific edit. Constructive edits are always welcome on Wikipedia, please keep that in mind next time. Happy editing.  Asension   (talk) 01:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 02:23, 15 December 2020 (UTC)