User talk:92.31.125.53

November 2021
Hello, I'm Always forever. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Informed Consent Action Network seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.    always forever  (talk)  00:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Neutral?
You're calling the legal team spreaders of misinformation. Which is accusing them of illegal law practices. That's not neutral

And Ican has won several major suits against pharmaceutical companies including Pfizer in the last few years. How is the truth not neutral but your slanderous opinion is? 92.31.125.53 (talk) 00:16, 20 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The claims on the page about Informed Consent Action Network that you modified were well sourced. The claim that ICAN spreads misinformation, in particular, has three citations associated with it. While it is totally permissible (and indeed encouraged!) to change incorrect claims in a Wikipedia article, you must provide sufficient reliable and independent sources to back up your own claims, specifically that ICAN has won lawsuits against Pfizer in the past. Your edit did not do that.


 * Furthermore, antivaccine positions are considered fringe theories by Wikipedia policy, so the article on ICAN must not claim that antivaccine theories are true but rather should affirm that antivaccine views are a marginal theory in the relevant scientific field. The position taken by the ICAN article is not a result of the opinions of individual editors, but rather the existing scientific consensus on the issue. Does this make sense?  always forever  (talk) 00:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)