User talk:92.34.147.148

March 2019
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to John Wilmot, 2nd Earl of Rochester— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 07:40, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello Serlos, thank you for your comment. I don't know if you'll see this but I'd like to explain my changes.

John Wilmot was the Earl of Rochester, he is known in history as the Earl of Rochester, the style The Right Honourable relates to his title as Earl of Rochester. All pages, that I've seen, that relates to a british peer his title is used in the infobox and it appears after that persons name in the article, the way I altered the article. Right now that article is not in keeping with the style and practice of how a article relating to a member of the british peerage is usually ordered. It's hardly a life or death matter but I just though the article should be (in my view) "correct".

Regards