User talk:92.40.158.58

December 2023
Hello, I'm Jacona. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Chris Heaton-Harris—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jacona (talk) 16:29, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

And read wp:vandal. Note that engaging in a wp:editwar over vandalism is not a good idea if you want to keep editing here. Slatersteven (talk)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Heaton-Harris. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fanfanboy (talk) 16:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slatersteven (talk) 16:33, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Chris Heaton-Harris, you may be blocked from editing. — MATRIX! (a good person!)&#91;citation unneeded&#93; 16:34, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

I will now be so nice, you have been warned once more and I report you., Slatersteven (talk) 16:34, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Heaton-Harris. Fanfanboy (talk) 16:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

I have now reported you for vandalism. Slatersteven (talk) 16:40, 14 December 2023 (UTC)