User talk:92.40.195.40

You are an anonymous single purpose IP address and this is pretty obviously personal to you so you need to make a declaration Please read up policy on BLP articles and also learn to use the talk page when you are reverted

And FYI I think Lissack's paper in response to Stochastic Parrots is poor and at some stage I will be criticising it. I have also sat on panels with a lot of academics (most of them with articles on Wikipedia) so I can't see how that is relevant and I am not hiding my ID behind an IP address.

Wikipedia has a whole set of community agreed rules as to what can and cannot go into articles. It is also built on the principle that if you are reverted you then discuss the change that you want on the talk page. If you don't you are edit warring and are likely to be blocked if you continue.

To elaborate the point, a block by twitter for harassement may well be notable and deserve inclusion. But it has to be sourced and it can't be combined with other material to make a point. If you make the case on the talk page of the article then it can be discussed, and if issues on sourcing are resolved, then an agreed text can be put on the article. That is the way things work here.

I am making an good faith assumption there that this is your first time editing wikipedia and that you haven't previously edited under another ID or IP address

Formal notice below -Snowded TALK 07:13, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Michael Lissack shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

May 2021
Hello, I'm Thehiddenworld. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Scrappy-Doo have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Thehiddenworld (talk) 04:20, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jute have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:16, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jute was changed by 92.40.195.40 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.991428 on 2021-05-16T18:16:24+00:00

December 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pee-wee's Big Holiday, you may be blocked from editing.   TylerBurden (talk) 14:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pee-wee's Big Holiday.   TylerBurden (talk) 16:43, 5 December 2021 (UTC)