User talk:92.40.212.188

April 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Stan Wood—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:32, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Materialscientist (talk) 06:32, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Padgate Academy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 07:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Next United Kingdom general election did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting, and then click the "Save" button. ''If you want the infobox with photos, you have to give a good reason why that infobox is better. I believe the one without photos is better because it doesn't imply that only some parties could win a significant number of seats at the election, which the infobox with photos does as it can't list all the parties.'' -- Ted  Edwards  01:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to John Fury—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ... disco spinster   talk  20:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)