User talk:92.40.219.187

June 2023
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Libreboot, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 19:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Libreboot, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dawnbails (talk) 19:34, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

The people editing that article are biased against the subject matter, and keep reverting good edits that people make.

I will not stop my attempts to clean the article.

There is persistent vandalism against the article, and calling my reverts of vandalism vandalism in itself does not invalidate my claim that those editors are vandals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.219.187 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

the editors in question keep reverting any changes made to the article, and they keep vandalising it themselves. when people reverte their vandalism, they reverte the revert, endlessly, and accuse of edit warring, but it is they who are edit warring.

attempts to talk to them through the talk page are not useful either. they are not editing in good faith.

June 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 19:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.