User talk:92.40.248.84

September 2013
Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to History of Apple Inc., because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Malaise has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Malaise was changed by 92.40.248.84 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864205 on 2014-12-10T01:05:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

July 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bolton Wanderers F.C. has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:52, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bolton Wanderers F.C. was changed by 92.40.248.84 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890707 on 2016-07-29T22:52:00+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bolton Wanderers F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 23:01, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Matt Goss, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop vandalising Bros articles under numerous accounts and IP addresses.Nqr9 (talk) 08:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 08:17, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Glenn Tamplin. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Govvy (talk) 17:19, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2020
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.