User talk:92.40.249.111

December 2015
Hello, I'm NottNott. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Mark Beaumont seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Nott Nott  talk &#124;contrib 21:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pukka Pies has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dcirovic (talk) 19:47, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Portsmouth with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Monty 845  19:55, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 21:46, 29 December 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 21:46, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Martyn Waghorn has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Adriana Leon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Adriana Leon was changed by 92.40.249.111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953919 on 2016-02-08T04:36:21+00:00.

March 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jonathan Rea, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Please stop deleting content deemed necessary by an experienced editor by switching IP addresses from 94.195.241.116.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 22:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC) Your recent editing history at Jonathan Rea shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly..--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 22:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm FoCuSandLeArN. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  14:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm Conana007. I noticed that in this edit to WannaCry ransomware attack, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Conana007 (talk) 09:27, 16 May 2017 (UTC)