User talk:92.47.226.227

January 2010
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. cab (talk) 08:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Additionally, please note that stub tags belong at the bottom of the article, not the top cab (talk) 08:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. cab (talk) 08:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. cab (talk) 08:03, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

National Security Committee
You are replacing content supported by reliable references by uncited text. Please stop and explain your revert at the talk page of the article. Materialscientist (talk) 08:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

Kindly request to read the above and explain your unreferenced esits. Materialscientist (talk) 08:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Of the elements of the list this user is inserting into the article, most appear to be a simple copyvio arrived at by direct translation from. But there's also the unsourced claim, also inserted on Russian Wikipedia, that the KNB acts "in the interests of the Kazakh ethnicity and the Turkic world" ("в интересах казахского народа и тюркского мира"), a pan-Turkist assertion you will not find in any reliable source about their activities and which certainly doesn't describe the policy orientation of Kazakhstan's government. cab (talk) 08:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)