User talk:92.7.141.169

May 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:Gaels, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 09:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

What was unconstructive about it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.7.141.169 (talk • contribs)


 * Once again, as you are an WP:INDEFfed user, under the latest of multiple IP WP:SOCK guises, any editing by you is unconstructive, simply because you are not allowed to edit at all. What's more you are a drain on the resources of other editors called on to address your disruptive campaign. The only constructive editing you may do is, also again, to WP:APPEAL your block. Best of luck with that one. Unless and until you succeed in that, go away.
 * To be clear, in my case, I am reverting you on the basis of your block, not your killer arguments. I neither read nor give a flying one about the latter. Mutt Lunker (talk) 12:08, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Excuse me?

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Gaels. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 12:46, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

As I asked you before, what was unconstructive about them?

No answer then. Great.