User talk:92.76.86.106

December 2017
Your recent editing history at Pinto Martins – Fortaleza International Airport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   11:08, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Pinto Martins – Fortaleza International Airport‎
Hi, Could you please stop vandalising the page Pinto Martins – Fortaleza International Airport‎, firstly the aircraft you are adding to the new section Abandoned aircraft is not needed none of this information has any encyclopedic value except the aircraft that was involved in Lufthansa Flight 181, i have added a small paragraph into the history section about this aircraft being significant. The other problem is the images, the airport is a relatively small airport compared to other airports in Brazil as it only has a handful of international flights. The page does not need to have multiple pictures of inside the terminal building they just create clutter on the page and distract the reader from the textual information. The 2 pictures of the old building and the old control tower and the images of the terminal building inside and out are sufficient enough for a page of this size, a gallery is not needed on this page either as they're aren't enough images to support using one and should only be used if really needed. If there is anything you need to discuss please take to the talk page instead of repeat vandalising please. CBG17 (talk) 15:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 15:27, 28 December 2017 (UTC)