User talk:92no0

Nomination of Small Maracanazo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Small Maracanazo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Small Maracanazo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 22:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Multiple voting
Greetings. In the discussion about whether or not to delete the article "Small Maracanazo," you tried to vote twice. That is not acceptable. You may want to familiarize yourself with the process. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 14:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I saw that another wikipedian voted two times changing his vote from delete to accept...so I thought that we had to vote again because the votation was reinserted from scratch. --92no0 (talk) 23:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * We can change our vote, if we want, after, of course, we strike our previous one. But we cannot vote the same way multiple times. Multiple voting does not fool admins but it does cause some confusion. And we need clarity in such discussions, i.e. who says what, how any people support this or that, etc. It is the reason Wikipedia takes strong measures against sockpuppet accounts and warns about single-purpose accounts. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 06:40, 10 April 2018 (UTC)