User talk:93.137.144.25

I am disappointed that to this day "flag of convenience" is mentioned. International law has ensured that insurance coverage is the same if not bigger for entire world fleet, never mind the flag. Flags "of convenience" are used for the convenience of the owners, less expensive, which is not an excuse. However, most of the traditional maritime nations are suffering from the lack of interest of the population for the seafaring jobs, and this is the one of the reasons for "flagging out". This is just a brief not as the issue is not that simple that can be described simply, and includes national laws and employment laws etc. >from the persšective of Wikipedia, it will be sufficient to state, "Panamanian flag". To those who are in the know all is clear, to those that aren't it does not provide negative connotations as those are not justified. Thank you