User talk:93.137.169.147

September 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Serbia in middle ages and Principality of Serbia, you may be blocked from editing. Theonewithreason (talk) 10. September 2021 (UTC)
 * I did not add any content, I remove crap maps which show Stari Ras within Serbia in the 9th and 10th century which is known to be wrong, fact.--93.137.169.147 (talk) 18:53, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 19:47, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * User:Favonian what bullshit is this? The Serbian propagandist Theonewithreason wrote to you after already writing to another administrator User:Vanjagenije because I wrote (link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AVanjagenije&type=revision&diff=1043569412&oldid=1043564320) and explained in details using maps and literature to Vanjagenije what kind of misinformation Theonewithreason is putting forward on Wikipedia. Vanjagenije didn't even manage to read my response. Theonewithreason is a Serbian propagandist who instead of addressing controverisal problem with the content in the articles rather decides to undo edits without any reason (being an IP is not a valid reason because Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia!), abuse admin's power by giving you false information to mislead you and block other parties so he doesn't need to deal with Serbian content issue. After the block Theonewithreason even put some lines over my legitimate concern on article talk pages (link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Theonewithreason) so others could ignore it. And this is "famed Wikipedia". Go to hell all of you. I am calling out a third admin, User:Peacemaker67, deal with this shit in your backyard. --93.137.169.147 (talk) 20:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * You'll get escalating blocks if you keep making personal attacks. When your block expires, focus on discussing what the reliable sources say not on the editor. See WP:NPA. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

User:Peacemaker67 my bad then, I am sorry, but that does not explain Theonewithreason's provocatively undoing my edits only because I am an IP and reporting me to the administrators after I started discussions at Talk:Principality of Serbia (early medieval) and Talk:Serbia in the Middle Ages in which Theonewithreason did not engage. How can I discuss when Theonewithreason is provocatively striking out my comments? With who I can discuss? With you? --93.137.169.147 (talk) 23:07, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Comments should only be stricken if they are being made by socks, and I have not seen any claims you are socking. I have removed the striking for now. Theonewithreason should be engaging with you on the talk page. If they fail to do so and keep reverting you, let me know. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:30, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * it appears they were stricken again and reverted again. The map seems suspect. I don’t recall Serbian lands stretched that far West. Similar issue with the map for the Kingdom of Croatia which seems oversized as well. There has been no reply on the article talk page. I clicked on this IP to get a glimpse of who this is and saw this conversation.