User talk:93.138.135.219

May 2022
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:RandomCanadian. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 11:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I asked you why else can it be, and here it can't? Why don't you answer and delete my post?93.138.135.219 (talk) 11:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * They are not expected to respond to personal attacks such as User RandomCanadian obviously he has something against Croatia, but you are expected to refrain from making such unsubstantiated accusations. El_C 11:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but that's how it turns out, because it's connected. Why can't there be a picture here, and elsewhere can't I don't understand?93.138.135.219 (talk) 11:20, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * In two important and reliable sources he deleted that it was a Pyrrhic victory and it is disputed why, if it says so there. Why there are double standards that apply to only one country in this case is Croatia and it must not be written properly.93.138.135.219 (talk) 11:24, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I know you won't answer me because it's politics, but it's not fair ,and this wikipedia is not as fair as you are promoting it, goodbye93.138.135.219 (talk) 11:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is generally not considered a valid reasoning to... do (or not do) whatever. And it certainly does not serve as a reasonable basis for serious accusations of that nature. You need to bring your concerns to the article talk page, and you need to do so while assuming good faith. It's easy to assume good faith when it's someone you agree with, the challenge is to do so with someone whom you disagree with. Making un-evidenced connections (WP:ASPERSIONS) rather than dealing with the dispute in a dispassionate and matter of fact way — that's a problem. One you need to be cognizant of moving forward. El_C 11:31, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't like to discuss some normal things on the talk page when things like this are accepted elsewhere. This is a problem that elsewhere on wikipedia it can be, and here it can't. So the problem is in the user RandomCanadian, not in me I think it's normal to understand. But if that's how you want wikipedia to work, that's fine, I don't like it, that's all.93.138.135.219 (talk) 11:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)


 * FWIW:
 * "Phyrric victory" is discouraged by WP:MILMOS. If need be, it is better to discuss such complex matters within the body of the article.
 * The arguments against fictitious portraits presented at WP:PORTRAIT (cited by another editor) seem persuasive to me. On top of that, the painting is probably still in copyright in the US (where Wikipedia is hosted) owing to it being less than 95 years old. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)