User talk:93.138.190.221

July 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

  Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:34, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.   Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I agree with you that books are not the only source, but I think that such claims still need much better sources than this, not from some news. 93.138.190.221 (talk) 19:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Please stop. Books are not the only reliable sources. I don't want to block you or protect the page, but . . . -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 19:07, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Fantastic! Now please make a convincing argument on the talk page and gain consensus for your edits. [[WP:EW|''edit warring is wrong, even if you

(think you) are right]]. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 19:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * It was not me who edited it, but others who put that source and made such claims so that he would have to ask for consensus, not me. I think that the one who edits and puts something should seek consensus if others do not agree. 93.138.190.221 (talk) 19:21, 1 July 2021 (UTC)