User talk:93.204.187.151

December 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cjse23 (talk) 18:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Your comments are inappropriate and your edits unhelpful. Please take greater care in the future.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Madagascar, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Additionally, please verify that your prose matches the "Use X English" tag normally at the top of articles. Splatterxl – talk 18:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Genesis P-Orridge. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

In particular, you changed text attributed to a specific source in ways that radically changed the meaning away from what the source actually said (namingly by implying that TOPY was an actual religious cult instead of a mock-cult), and which rendered the follow-on clause confusing. It was anything but the cleanup of "slippiness" you claimed it was, and resulted in a great deal more awkwardness. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:31, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * It is difficult to conceive a more inappropriate comment and misguided edit. Thankfully another editor reverted your flawed edit. Please take far greater care in the future.