User talk:93.33.174.104

May 2016
Hello, I'm Dan56. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edits to Agharta (album) and Live-Evil (Miles Davis album) removed and/or revised content without stating a reason or citing a source to verify the changes made. I reverted your changes, but if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 23:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Live! Blueswailing July '64. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Your ongoing attempts to add erroneous info to Yardbirds and Eric Clapton articles will continue to be reverted. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

May 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at The Doors (album). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 17:26, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2018
Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Still Life (The Rolling Stones album), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 13:25, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Flashpoint (album). - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 13:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Flashpoint (album). The SandDoctor Talk 01:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! The SandDoctor Talk 01:10, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at The Rolling Stones discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:51, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Talkback
The SandDoctor Talk 06:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Yardbirds Story. —Ojorojo (talk) 16:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Yardbirds Story. —Ojorojo (talk) 13:48, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * This warning with more explanation was added to User talk:93.33.175.210. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:37, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Light My Fire. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - FlightTime Phone  ( open channel ) 15:48, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 16:16, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.