User talk:93.93.218.148

January 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Children Act 2004 was changed by 93.93.218.148 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957584 on 2013-01-30T09:08:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:08, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Alan Sugar ‎, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello, I'm Jeff G.. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to American Dream, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  —  Jeff G. ツ  (talk)   09:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Dougweller (talk) 09:48, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to P. J. Marshall, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Yintan ²   08:12, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm Jonathanfu. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Bagger 288, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jonathanfu (talk) 12:44, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm Kirachinmoku. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Samuel Parker (bishop of Oxford), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Kira Chinmoku  ( T, ¤ ) 12:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Kettle has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kettle was changed by 93.93.218.148 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.991621 on 2013-09-18T13:28:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:28, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kettle. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 13:28, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kettle, you may be blocked from editing. Pinethicket (talk) 13:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kettle, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ginsuloft (talk) 13:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Diannaa (talk) 13:54, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm John Cline. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to System bus, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —John Cline (talk) 09:36, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Nick Levine. An edit that you recently made to Copyright seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Nick Levine (talk) 11:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Copyright with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —— Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 11:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Emma Darwin because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 13:27, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gabion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. K6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 12:12, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gabion, you may be blocked from editing. K6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 12:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fine (penalty), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.   Tentinator    13:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014
Hello, I'm John Cline. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Tolpuddle Martyrs, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —John Cline (talk) 11:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tolpuddle Martyrs with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —John Cline (talk) 11:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tolpuddle Martyrs with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —John Cline (talk) 11:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Tolpuddle Martyrs. —John Cline (talk) 11:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm PhilKnight. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Adidas, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 09:31, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Amazon.com. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 11:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Currys, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 11:55, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leicester City F.C. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ow@!s (talk) 10:35, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Zimbabwe, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:53, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Football in England because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 10:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Stockholm congestion tax has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stockholm congestion tax was changed by 93.93.218.148 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958232 on 2015-10-02T13:31:36+00:00.

December 2017
Hello, I'm There'sNoTime. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lutterworth College— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:22, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lutterworth High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 10:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Black-box testing. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. – Gilliam (talk) 10:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.