User talk:93.97.53.102

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Marshal of the Diplomatic Corps has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. > RUL3R >trolling >vandalism  09:46, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Marshal of the Diplomatic Corps. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. > RUL3R >trolling >vandalism  09:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Marshal of the Diplomatic Corps. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. > RUL3R >trolling >vandalism  09:55, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war&#32;at Marshal of the Diplomatic Corps. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. NJA (t/ c)  12:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Marshal of the Diplomatic Corps
Welcome to Wikipedia.

From your last edit here, I see you're trying to update information to what's currently correct. The problem is that in the process of doing so you became involved in an edit war and broke the 3 revert rule. Your account has been temporarily blocked from editing due to breach of the rule, and it will end soon. To avoid further issues, I recommend stating on the article's talk page that you've made the change to reflect the current reality. Providing a citation or reference would also be beneficial.

Usually editing isn't this difficult, however your initial efforts were done without using a descriptive edit summary, and therefore your actions were likely misinterpreted by others as vandalism. Thus it's nothing personal, and use of edit summaries everytime and article talk pages when you're having a dispute should help alleviate these types of issues in future. NJA (t/ c)  12:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I am sorry to have engaged in an edit war with you. Since you did not cite a source, or linked to an article on an existing person, I mistakenly believed you were adding yourself to the article (believe it or not, it happens quite often.) If you wish to appeal your block, you have my full support. Cheers. > RUL3R >trolling >vandalism  13:00, 5 January 2010 (UTC)