User talk:94.145.178.84

October 2018
I believe that was quoted Carl Benjamin you were referring to. That content is wp:reliably sourced and meets wp:DUE and wp:BLP. Take it to talk per wp:BRD. Jim1138 (talk) 20:07, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

There are five sources that support or even specifically state "targeted harassment campaign". Wikipedia goes by what wp:reliable sources state. Jim1138 (talk) 06:52, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

I undid your edit as you used wp:weasel words. Such phrasing puts in wp:Wikipedia's voice. It should be per the source. Please discuss any edits on talk:Carl Benjamin per wp:BRD. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 07:16, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Carl Benjamin. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kirbanzo (talk) 15:17, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.