User talk:94.193.85.100

Please check your information correctly otherwise you will be blocked. This is because what you are posting is considered defamation or slander and would put this site at risk of legal action because of this. Continuing to attempt to post such defamatory material will result in legal pursuit in your jurisdiction. We have requested your information from your Internet Service Provider. Your IP address is 94.193.85.100.

We have checked the regulator's website and contacted them by email. They have confirmed that there is no suspension in effect, as decisions from the MPTS do not take effect for 28 days from a decision. In this period, the decision may be challenged. It is our understanding from our sources that the decision is being challenges. Checking directly with the MPTS or GMC will confirm this. The BBC and other venues have thus mis-reported the events and this should be considered "Fake News".

94.193.85.100 (talk) 17:45, 12 January 2020 (UTC)First thing first, it is my pleasure to talk to the infamouse professor directly. Secondly, are you calling BBC "fake news"? According to Wikipedia's policy as I quote "Material about living persons should not be added when the only sourcing is tabloid journalism", if you look at Wikipedia's Tabloid Journalism page. BBC is, as expected, not on the list. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabloid_journalism. This might be because BBC is considered to be a reliable source. Thirdly, if you really want my information from my internet service provider what you need is a court order which I doubt that you have acquired in such a short notice. Threating me with my IP address has a minimal effect on me since I knew that my IP address would be publically available when I edited the page. Last but not least, I advise you to read this Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_legal_threats. "Do not make legal threats on Wikipedia. A legal threat, in this context, is a threat to engage in an external (real life) legal or other governmental process that would target other editors...Legal threats should be reported to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or elsewhere to an administrator. Users who make legal threats are typically blocked from editing while the threats are outstanding."

What if I keep the statement but add this one sentence to my paragraph "as decisions from the MPTS do not take effect for 28 days from a decision. In this period, the decision may be challenged. It is our understanding from our sources that the decision is being challenges" would it make things better?