User talk:94.196.112.179

May 2024
Hello, I'm Me Da Wikipedian. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Also, please do not make your edits over (101!) revisions, as that is really annoying to look through Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 11:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


 * To You Da Wikipedian
 * I haven't provided any reliable sources yet as I was still working on tidying up & re-balancing a rather messy & male-orientated & over-US centric webpage. I had not finished.  Nothing was deleted, rather text was edited for better explanation & clarification with more diverse examples linked through to the respective webpages.  In many of the edits, these relate to simply bullet-pointing the examples instead of leaving the confused comma-separated ones that are much less legible.  The examples were also improved in pairing to the source material too.  There are also a number of types for which no description or examples exist, that I was remedying.
 * As the webpage was a nexus for many webpages - i.e. it is a listing page the issue of citations is tied more to the linked pages.
 * I work by editing a paragraph or two at a time before publishing to the public again. So it leads to a long list of edits.  Al you need to do is go to the final one to see all the changes.
 * I would like if you would republish my emendments - if you consider my corrections & clarifications from my last edit - you will see that it is much improved and as stated before, I had not finished. Please read the corrections before being over enthusiastic on slapping a halt. 94.196.112.179 (talk) 11:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * By any chance was this an automated slap halt to the editing after tripping over 100 revisions?
 * The 1st 4 lines appear to be a pro-forma notice with you adding the final sentence in italics on spotting the number of edit revisions. Instead of launching / allowing it to launch this slap, how about instead of checking the emendments in what has actually been published. 94.196.112.179 (talk) 11:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)