User talk:94.204.98.207

April 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to United States five-dollar bill, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ZLEA T \ C 17:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Reverted, Legacy is very similar to achievements.

~With regards, I followed The Username Policy (Message Me) (What I have done on Wikipedia) 18:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ElENdElA. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lincoln Memorial without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ElENdElA (talk) 20:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Lincoln Memorial‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ElENdElA (talk) 20:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Oregon, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ternera (talk) 19:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Terneracoild you explain what was the problem in adding each century on top of each paragraph? as that only specifies when a certain event took place to make it more clear for the reader to understand. 94.204.98.207 (talk) 19:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 04:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Your edit to Lincoln Memorial has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Equestrian statue of George Washington (Washington Circle), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  The Savage  Norwegian  01:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Flag of Minnesota, you may be blocked from editing. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I’m trying to add the criticism section in the history section as I don’t think it’s necessary needed but it won’t preview. 94.204.98.207 (talk) 11:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I disagree with your assessment btw - that it's history not criticism - but if you think the criticism section about the flag's recent design change is in the wrong place, then you should discuss all that on the article talk. Shearonink (talk) 11:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok then, but please use the edit summary box to describe your action, otherwise it seems you are just removing content and this would lead other editors to revert you changes. Thanks, and happy editing, --DoebLoggs (talk) 11:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Equestrian statue of George Washington (Washington Circle) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''I appreciate your using an edit summary on your most recent edit to this article, but you need to take your concerns to the article talk page and see if there is editorial consensus to remove that "Free Hamas" content. It is not a good practice to keep on changing an article to your preferred version when other editors dsiagree with you.'' Shearonink (talk) 12:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)