User talk:94.245.11.42

August 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Liberty University appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 06:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to Liberty University. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 06:57, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Liberty University shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tgeorgescu (talk) 06:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

See https://www.patheos.com/blogs/religionprof/2016/07/i-have-this-book-heres-how-i-got-it.html Tgeorgescu (talk) 07:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)


 * See instead; https://answersingenesis.org/creation-vs-evolution/ 94.245.11.42 (talk) 19:11, 25 August 2019 (UTC)


 * We don't consider that website as a WP:RS. Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Which is irrelevant. I was merely responding to your own linked article with a better one. 94.245.11.42 (talk) 16:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)