User talk:95.10.203.242

September 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Göle, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 19:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please also refer to Wikipedia's reliable source policy. Independent sources are required. S0091 (talk) 19:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

You are right! climate-data.org is not reliable
Hi! I did a search on WP:RSN and found this:, which is actually the second discussion. In both, consensus was climate-data.org is not reliable. If you get reverted again, please start a discussion on the article's talk page. If you decide to remove the content again, please state in your edit summary something like "Per RSN, climate-data.org is not a reliable source" and hopefully that will do it. :) S0091 (talk) 20:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)