User talk:95.145.208.26

November 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Welsh language, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Please read and comply with WP:BRD as requested. You were Bold, you were Reverted now it is YOU that is to Discuss the matter. Do not war.'' Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:21, 28 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Well, the capital letters have really made an impression on me.
 * I'll repeat what I said. It is valid data, it is used on other languages' pages, it is from the most authoritative source on vulnerable languages, and has a set of premade images available on Wikimedia for use promulgating this data. Don't gang up on me. You're the guilty party. Good luck finding all the other language pages that have this on! 95.145.208.26 (talk) 16:08, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Evidently not as you are still missing the point. My edits concerned your actions, not content. When someone reverts your edit you do not edit war but you discuss, at the article's talk page. I was not addressing the validity or otherwise of the content but that you were warring about it. Mutt Lunker (talk) 16:22, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * And naturally you've written a similarly derisive message to the individual who rage-deleted my wholly valid contribution without discussing it / messaging me first. Had you even considered the bias present on a page covering an emotive subject like the Welsh language? I'm not a native Welsh speaker, but I know any suggestion of the language's precarious situation could offend, regardless of it being a documented fact. Did you notice the wholly unsupported claim in the first section about Welsh being the only language not considered endangered when the only data available anywhere says it is?
 * You say this isn't about content but actions, but the actions are validated by the content. Talk to the other chap. 95.145.208.26 (talk) 17:05, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you're going to take perfectly calm and reasoned invitation to discuss a matter as a personal affront, you are going to neeedlessly find Wikipedia an upsetting place to be. The other editor ("chap" or otherwise) wrote an explanatory edit summary; there is no reason to notify you personally as well. If you had the article on your watchlist, you would be aware of the edit and the summary. If you don't, that's your choice but you can't expect others to make additional, individual contact. The other editor was not warring, so I have no need to discuss warring with them. You were, so I am.
 * BRD isn't complicated. You made an edit, someone had a concern about it so requested you discussed the matter and returned the article to its previous state, pending the consensus outcome of that discussion (which is yet to be started by you there). This is a normal thing here; it is not some hostile act. If you are so sure you are right, you will surely be able to make your case. There is no "the actions are validated by the content" bypass of BRD.
 * I am not familiar with the content and am not addressing it so stop continually trying to sideline me into looking at it, it will not justify your warring. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:52, 30 November 2022 (UTC)