User talk:95.175.83.119

January 2021
Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hole punch, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Wikipedia does not accept "They're all valid", as asserted by anyone (not just an unregistered user, but that is a red flag), as a valid and verifiable reference. Please discuss this at WP:TEAHOUSE if the only problem is that you don't know how to do a comprehensive citation. Thanks.  Julietdeltalima   (talk) '' 17:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

In the edit summary, I already added the detailed information of where I've found the released dates and months of the established years of the conductor's punch and hole punch. Have you read it already? Please.
 * No, you didn't; that is visibly false. And if you truly have this information, from a reliable source, and don't know how to cite it correctly, the editors at WP:TEAHOUSE will be happy to help you. An edit summary is completely inappropriate for citations. How would a user know to look in edit summaries (which are not even a thing most Wikipedia users know exist, and which are primarily for contributors to the project) for a reliable source? You're not helping the project at all. Please either learn how to do this correctly, or just stop. -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  17:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

I went to the WP HOUSe and it's written that I've temporarily been blocked. Please.