User talk:95.182.253.150

June 2020
Hello, I'm TheImaCow. I noticed that you recently removed content from Minimum Evolution without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   TheImaCow (talk) 09:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Dear Thelma,

Thanks for your message.

I am pretty new to Wikipedia and I am learning how to modify pages step by step. I will definitely follow the suggestion from now on.

Entering in the merit of the change, please note that the text that you have restored sounds quite weird to experts in the field.

What “tree-optimality” criterion means? And the difference between the two criteria is not “just” distances versus characters, unless we do not want to target primary schools.

It would be necessary to

1. Redirect this paragraph to the major page Minimum Evolution (that must be expanded)

2. Remove the restored text by replacing it with a summary of the Minimum Evolution page.

3. Reconsider the whole maximum parsimony page by addressing all of the weird parts.

4. Reconsider the least-squares page as well as the neighbors joining page and cast all inside the Balanced Minimum Evolution Framework.

Let me now if you are interested in discussing further the subject.

2A02:A03F:6168:7A00:60A2:4231:6780:7CA2 (talk) 13:27, 8 June 2020 (UTC)