User talk:95.232.103.206

July 2021
Hello, I'm Suonii180. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Derrick Johnson (activist) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Suonii180 (talk) 19:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Derrick Johnson (activist). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:05, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Derrick Johnson (activist) was changed by 95.232.103.206 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866847 on 2021-07-28T19:05:03+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Derrick Johnson (activist), you may be blocked from editing. Suonii180 (talk) 19:06, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Derrick Johnson (activist) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You have already made three reverts to this article concerning labeling the subject as a "terrorist". Please do not do it again.'' Johnnie Bob (talk) 19:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)