User talk:95.25.77.155

Use of AI-written content on Wikipedia
Hello, I'm Belbury. An edit that you recently made to Immersive sim seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. I have reverted your edit. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Belbury (talk) 12:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey! Hello. You say: <>
 * So, why don't you check this?
 * I rechecked it all 5 days in a row. And I myself corrected every word in this formulation. Do you have any criticism of my wording or remarks on the topic? 95.25.77.155 (talk) 14:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * From the source it was you having a conversation with an AI to see what you could both agree on when defining the topic? WP:LLM considers AI content to be a form of original research. You writing down your own thoughts is also original research. So the text of conversation you had is not suitable for a Wikipedia article.
 * By all means use the AI's comments as a starting point for improving the article by hand, but you will need to use reliable secondary sources. See Verifiability. Belbury (talk) 15:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Immersive sim. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''As I say above, a conversation you had with an AI is original research, it cannot be used as a source in a Wikipedia article. Do not add it again.'' Belbury (talk) 18:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)