User talk:95.44.50.222

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (95.44.50.222) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and  [ create an account] . If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! RegistryKey(RegEdit) 07:08, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm Samf4u. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my my talk page. - Samf4u (talk) 15:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * , I came across the word "cottaging" in the Edward Heath article and, as I had no idea what it meant, I clicked the link, and saw that it meant frequenting public toilets for the purpose of sexual encounters. To save future readers the trouble, I put an explanation in brackets after the linked word. In what way is this unconstructive? Which policy should I read to show me the error of my ways? I have reverted your revert. 95.44.50.222 (talk) 15:56, 10 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi 95.44.50.222 and thanks for your note here. The link itself explains the term making your explanation redundant. - Samf4u (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2017 (UTC)


 * , I disagree. It should be possible to read to the end of a sentence without having to click a link in order to understand it. The linked article provides more coverage and that's fine, but it's not a substitute for an explanation. 95.44.50.222 (talk) 17:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Sorry if you disagree but it simply isn't done that way. Take it up with Charles (talk) if you like, he reverted it too. I see you have made many constructive edits and hope you continue to do so, Cheers - Samf4u (talk) 18:23, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Northern Ireland protocol
If the person reading this is the one who just revised the Northern Ireland Protocol article, thank you. I forgot to check for orphaned references. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)


 * You're very welcome, . I always register big red error messages in the references section. 95.44.50.222 (talk) 17:25, 2 October 2021 (UTC)