User talk:95.93.194.214

September 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Beauty and the Beast (2017 film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Pointless edits
Please don't make pointless edits that simply move content around randomly in infoboxes, as you did in. It clutters watchlists and article histories. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fargo (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  The Old Jacobite  The '45  16:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The People v. O. J. Simpson: American Crime Story, you may be blocked from editing. Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 15:57, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Natalie Portman.  4TheWynne (talk) (contribs)  12:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at List of highest-grossing films in the United Kingdom. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Betty Logan (talk) 17:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Greatest Showman. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked
I've blocked IP address for 1 week because the person using it has been warned repeatedly about making contentious edits without providing sources of information or without explaining yourself. If you wish to be unblocked, please follow the directions in the template below. -- Jayron 32 20:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jayron 32 20:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)