User talk:950731sj

December 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Seth MacFarlane. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 10:05, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Westlife, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Westlife was changed by 950731sj (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-12-10T10:42:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Westlife. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Anna Lincoln  10:43, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Backstreet Boys. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Anna Lincoln  10:46, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sebbe stroth
A tag has been placed on Sebbe stroth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 21:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. andy (talk) 21:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)