User talk:95Larick/Archive 1

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:31, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Coaching trees
Per your edit at Barry Wilson (American football), you may want to weight in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football. In the meantime, can you find reliable third-party sources that establish Wilson as have a notable coaching tree? Jweiss11 (talk) 04:49, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Adding defamatory content
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to David Hogg (activist)‎, especially if it involves living persons. Note that if you continue to make edits such as this one I may topic ban you from biographies of living persons and post-1932 American politics as you now have been given alerts relating to these areas.  Doug Weller  talk 11:34, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Your recent editing history at David Hogg (activist) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week certain areas of the encyclopedia for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 14:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

WP:V
Don't insert unsourced info, poorly-sourced info, or irrelevant info, especially into biographies of living persons. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)


 * You are correct that I don’t have a source for marital status so I will leave that alone. As far as Knapp’s unsuccessful requests for adminship are concerned, though, the edit is both sourced and relevant to an article about someone known for their work on Wikipedia - so it will stay. 95Larick (talk) 02:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , WP:BRD and also you cannot use Wikipedia as a source on Wikipedia. You need to read our guidelines on sourcing. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)


 * 95Larick, I noticed your edit on Justin Knapp article via this exchange because I've had your talked page watchlisted ever since I left you a message here about another matter a few days ago. The issue with your edit on the Knapp article is sourcing. Do you have a reliable third-party source talking about Knapp attempts for adminship? If it wasn't covered somewhere reliable outside of Wikipedia, it's not notable. Jweiss11 (talk) 03:38, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Justin Knapp. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week from certain areas of the encyclopedia for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 03:55, 10 February 2020 (UTC)