User talk:96.225.97.51

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to British Mediterranean Airways, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: British Mediterranean Airways was changed by 96.225.97.51 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879851 on 2012-02-01T23:02:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of iCarly characters. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of iCarly characters was changed by 96.225.97.51 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957724 on 2012-02-01T23:04:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:04, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of iCarly characters with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. QU TalkQu 23:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rumson Country Day School, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rumson Country Day School was changed by 96.225.97.51 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.984777 on 2012-02-25T16:46:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stenoptilia luteocinereus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stenoptilia luteocinereus was changed by 96.225.97.51 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950035 on 2012-02-25T16:49:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:49, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rumson Country Day School, you may be blocked from editing. —Hue Sat  Lum  16:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm Fluffernutter. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Pete Dawkins, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 01:55, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Article Evaluation
The article titled "Sweetened beverages," portrays the product in a bias and health-oriented light. In terms of relevance, the article presents significant facts, however, still manages to stray off into immaterial topics. For example, the "Milk vs Sweetened Beverage Consumption" section appears disconnected from the rest of the piece. As the entire article hones in on the broader implications of sweetened beverage consumption, this study about children selecting sugary drinks over milk seems out of place.

The article is also written with an anti-sweetened beverage bias, and calls the product "liquid candy" in the second sentence. Viewpoints from beverage industry representatives (pro-sweetened beverages) could have neutralized the article. Next, citations are almost all correctly linked to related material. I found that only one of six links led me to a page with "no document." Additionally, the sources primarily consisted of non-bias scientific journals. A few facts, such as information about the effects of sweetened drinks on oral health, came from more bias articles written by dental societies (bias was not noted.)

This article does not move outside of the nutritional impacts of "sweetened beverages," omitting entirely, the economic and social implications. The one comment on the Talk page describes it as a "Bad article" because of its bias/focus on nutrition. The user tags the article under "Food and drink articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy." Additionally, notes are made that the article was part of the WikiProject Food and Drink, and Wiki Education Foundation. This link to nutrition education may explain the obvious bias. The article has been rated as "High-importance," and "Start-Class" in quality.

Lastly, I noticed that Wikipedia discusses the information gaps much more than we did. It seems to emphasize the importance of what was not written (bias). The website highlights content gaps, which seem to be missing chunks of information that may render an article less neutral. These gaps can be identified by searching for contrasting views in a piece, and realizing if one is missing. This relates to bias, which I define as the favoring of one side. The individual writing the article is therefore significant, because they have clear control of what lean an article takes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yalie123 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 18 October 2017 (UTC)