User talk:96.241.234.142

April 2020
Hello, I'm Galendalia. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Galendalia (talk) 00:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Fantastic_Beasts_and_Where_to_Find_Them_(film). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Galendalia (talk) 04:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to History of the steel industry (1850–1970), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. jp×g 16:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Janet Yellen, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:34, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

You have to get your facts straight
[https ://cse.umn.edu/college/historical-milestones “Although the College of Science and Engineering (formerly the Institute of Technology) was founded in 1935, its roots extend to the University's infancy. Here are historical milestones to note.”]

Tim Foecke earned degrees in 1986 and 1991. Are you able to connect the dots? ThurstonMitchell (talk) 13:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Zchrykng. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Samuel Graham (engineer), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   zchrykng (talk) 15:35, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * It was announced to the faculty 5 minutes ago via email. If you weren't such a noodge, you'd wait a day or so before nuking the edit and it would be common knowledge.  Get a life.
 * Reliable sources must be published sources. We need to wait until the PR office issues a release. —C.Fred (talk) 15:39, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, look at that. —C.Fred (talk) 15:49, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Anni-Frid Lyngstad. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 02:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.