User talk:96.255.107.133

February 2017
Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Golmaal 4, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Diffs: Per WP:NFF, you must demonstrate that the film has begun principal photography, and that would require references. Thank you.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Malaika Arora Khan, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: Content in biographies of living people must be impeccably sourced. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to List of The Kapil Sharma Show episodes. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 23:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Ram Lakhan 2, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:22, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Ram Lakhan 2. ''Stop removing the AFD notice. That process will continue, removing the AFD template helps nobody and can cause you to be blocked or prevented from editing the article. The best option you have is to find reliable sources for the movie showing that filming has started. Anything else and you'll need until the filming starts.'' Ravensfire ( talk ) 22:47, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent removal of WP:AFD tags, as done at Ram Lakhan 2. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Ram Lakhan 2, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 21:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 21:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 02:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Kaashi (film), you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 12:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Sooraj Pancholi (actor), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 129.63.32.71 (talk) 21:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sooraj Pancholi (actor). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 05:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017
Hello, I'm 72. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –72 (talk)  00:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.