User talk:96.27.71.143

January 2016
Hello, I'm Donner60. An edit you recently made to Guy Fieri seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:36, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Guy Fieri with this edit. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pete Rose, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Pete Rose was changed by 96.27.71.143 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874044 on 2016-01-26T23:38:16+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:38, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dragon Tales. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Dragon Tales was changed by 96.27.71.143 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958772 on 2016-01-26T23:41:46+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 23:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, I'm David.moreno72. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to John Green (author)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. David.moreno72 (talk) 03:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Jones (actor). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Michael Jones (actor) was changed by 96.27.71.143 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917098 on 2016-03-01T02:21:28+00:00.

May 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Toothpick— because it did not appear to be constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mz7 (talk) 02:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Toothpick. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:01, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Toothpick was changed by 96.27.71.143 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880377 on 2016-05-01T03:01:41+00:00.

August 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dancing Plague of 1518 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dancing Plague of 1518 was changed by 96.27.71.143 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968099 on 2016-08-14T06:24:41+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)