User talk:96.31.190.97

May 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Hera—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 04:48, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * What isn't constructive is the original research, sexist bias, and other vandalism of this page. This isn't experimentation. There is no controversy for the claims. There is no support for it being controversial. It is merely an alternative theory. Like many other theories. The Section I edited is blatantly biased and needs to be written neutrally. I tried going through the standard process of discussion and then editing but those with the clear bias clearly didn't want to even consider that. I have no problem with language stating it isn't a mainstream theory in neutral terms as articles are suppose to follow. But it isn't and until such time as it is written that way it has no place on the article. All people had to do was edit it to fit that language or just leave it and let people research it themselves.

And no it isn't networked and I have no interest in creating an account. My IP is fine for my edits. I don't need wikipedia sending me spam email on top of the countless other sites that do. 96.31.190.97 (talk) 05:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia won't send you "spam emails". It is a non-profit organization supported by its contributors and donors. Alcaios (talk)
 * Except it did, when I USED to have an account. 96.31.190.97 (talk) 23:48, 21 May 2020 (UTC)