User talk:96.33.149.151

October 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ram Dass has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:47, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ram Dass was changed by 96.33.149.151 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892199 on 2017-10-05T03:47:23+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carl Sagan, you may be blocked from editing. – Rhinopias (talk) 19:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Operating Thetan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Operating Thetan was changed by 96.33.149.151 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9679 on 2017-12-15T16:16:07+00:00.

July 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Qliphoth, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 04:38, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

the source is the mind I am in there We say so and how are you where do you think the source is just going through the corridors and gateways of thought and it`s process and you know you just find that kind of stuff

September 2018
Hello, I'm CataracticPlanets. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Taqwa have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CataracticPlanets (talk) 00:13, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Adam Jones (musician)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk  19:06, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Adam Jones (musician)
In order to change the name from Jones to Jenson on the Adam Jones (musician) article, you will have to verify that with reliable source. Until then, you can discuss the change on the article's talk page. Without evidence, you really can't change the name that has been verified from a number of sources. --Wikipelli Talk  19:13, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Hello, I'm Aranya. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Siberian Tatars have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. – Aranya (talk) 18:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Siberian Tatars. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ComplexRational (talk) 18:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Siberian Tatars, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 19:01, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Siberian Tatars. - Arjayay (talk) 19:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kufic—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CLCStudent (talk) 21:52, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Droit du seigneur—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:59, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Droit du seigneur. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:01, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. CLCStudent (talk) 14:02, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.