User talk:96.33.193.23

Interstate 72 Future
Like I preveously stated I am sorry for the accidental break in that info and I did my best to fix it here is the source: http://www.futureinterstatecorridors.com/I-76,%20I-72.html

I will try to find a source that passes the test I promise ok. I will just add it in and you tell me if it passes the tests. 96.33.193.23 (talk) 04:26, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * That source just does not qualify per WP:RS. We can't use it, sorry.
 * Additionally, extensions of highways are not given their own rows in the tables like that. If the source were reliable, we'd use it to add a future section to the I-72 article instead.  Imzadi 1979  →   04:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Please stop adding a Future I-72 to that table. Your new source doesn't pass the test because it's not attributing the proposal to an agency that could actually make it happen. That agency would be MoDOT, and you would really need a news article saying MoDOT has proposed an extension.
 * Assuming this were a proper proposal from MoDOT, we still would not add it to the list table as a separate row. Extensions are added to the article on a highway. So please just stop trying to add something that doesn't belong.  Imzadi 1979  →   04:47, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, you should read WP:BRD. You were being Bold by trying to add to Wikipedia, but you've been Reverted (several times), so the next step is to Discuss. Please do not attempt to restore the content to the table without further discussion and consensus to add it.  Imzadi 1979  →   04:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Well I did not notice when you said for me to stop putting it back in to the table my bad. 96.33.193.23 (talk) 13:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Just put it into the Interstate 72 article right? 96.33.193.23 (talk) 13:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you have a reliable source, i.e. one with a record for fact checking and editorial control? Does the source state that MoDOT has proposed the change? I can propose the creation of an Interstate 98 on my own personal website, but since I'm not a state department of transportation, and my website is self-published, both the proposal and the source don't count. If you can't meet both criteria, please don't update the I-72 article.  Imzadi 1979  →   17:42, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

I have gotten a new source (that is not a personal website), as the other one did not state that MoDot proposed that idea. This one says that this was brought up at the Missouri Highway Conference. 96.33.193.23 (talk) 20:22, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * That source doesn't support your content. It doesn't have a length, it doesn't have a date, and it doesn't have the purported western terminus. It also doesn't state that MoDOT made the proposal. So in short, please just stop.  Imzadi 1979  →   23:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Looks like I have been blocked from editing. 96.33.193.23 (talk) 20:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Once again, I am telling you I have been blocked from editing so I cant put in my new source (not the one you are talking about). 96.33.193.23 (talk) 03:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Here is the source I was talking about: https://www.interstate-guide.com/i-072/. 96.33.193.23 (talk) 03:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Like most of the "roadgeek" websites, the Interstate Guide is self-published. That means it doesn't meet Wikipedia's criteria for usage as a citation. What we really need are news articles, official DOT materials or even books to use as sources.  Imzadi 1979  →   04:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, reading through that webpage, it's not a source that supports what you want it to support. You have a county commission suggesting an extension, and another commission at the state level discussing it. Neither of which rises to the level of MoDOT saying they want to extend I-72 to Cameron. The rest of the text is speculation. Sorry, even if that webpage met our criteria, and it doesn't, it still doesn't support what you want to add.  Imzadi 1979   →   04:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Ok well I would rather learn from your constructive criticism so I could get a better understanding. Thank you for letting me know. 96.33.193.23 (talk) 21:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC)