User talk:96.4.107.42

October 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mary Margaret O'Reilly has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mary Margaret O'Reilly was changed by 96.4.107.42 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954943 on 2015-10-14T18:42:52+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gerrion Jones. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:46, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gerrion Jones was changed by 96.4.107.42 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908786 on 2015-10-14T18:46:18+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gerrion Jones with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 18:47, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dred Scott has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dred Scott was changed by 96.4.107.42 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96509 on 2016-02-08T16:50:43+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Henry David Thoreau. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Henry David Thoreau was changed by 96.4.107.42 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916985 on 2016-02-08T16:55:34+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Underground Railroad with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 17:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tim Burton has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:01, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tim Burton was changed by 96.4.107.42 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899214 on 2016-04-08T13:01:30+00:00.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tim Burton with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:03, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tim Burton with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:03, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Tim Burton.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Grand Canal (China)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 13:56, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Grand Canal (China). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 13:58, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Grand Canal (China), you may be blocked from editing. Dcirovic (talk) 14:06, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grand Canal (China). — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 14:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017
Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Samurai— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. ← 13:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Slippery When Wet Tour. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:01, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Thomas More—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 13:34, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Diomand pickle


A tag has been placed on Draft:Diomand pickle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Velella  Velella Talk 14:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ancient Egyptian religion—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Balon Greyjoy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Stamen Grigorov—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 12:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)