User talk:96.4.165.85

February 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Deborah Sampson has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Deborah Sampson was changed by 96.4.165.85 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951374 on 2018-02-07T16:45:07+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Elizabeth Eckford. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. byteflush Talk 20:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Elizabeth Eckford, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Elizabeth Eckford was changed by 96.4.165.85 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943332 on 2018-02-22T20:26:13+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:26, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Elizabeth Eckford. Shellwood (talk) 20:26, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 20:29, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Compromise of 1850— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 17:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dred Scott v. Sandford, you may be blocked from editing.  Whispe ring  17:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dred Scott v. Sandford. - Arjayay (talk) 17:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)