User talk:96.54.186.128

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jeanine Áñez.

Edit summary
Any more edit summaries like this and you'll be blocked.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Reddit obviously isn't a reliable source for the weapons used. Some people have watched the video and come up with their own theories about the weapons. The consensus is not to name the weapons unless it comes from the investigators.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 03:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Imatra shooting—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 07:05, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Yountville shooting, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denniss (talk) 23:21, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020
Your recent editing history at Mass murder shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bennv3771 (talk) 08:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mass murder, you may be blocked from editing. – Erakura (talk) 23:50, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:54, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Recent edit to Campinas massacre
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Campinas massacre, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 20:32, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Only warning
Two things. First of all, you need to use edit summaries to explain what you are doing. In addition, you need to copyedit before you post an edit and provide reliable sources. Second, you need to reconsider when you think it would be wise to add gun- and murder-related details to an article. In many cases, it is not. We are an encyclopedia, not a repository for details that are relevant only for some people--people who like guns, perhaps. Drmies (talk) 02:46, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree that you should be posting citations to Reliable sources. It would make things better for everyone because nobody likes read unsourced info. Thanks for reading this. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 07:13, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:12, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shell Lake murders, you may be blocked from editing. Jake (talk) 05:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shell Lake murders. Tdts5 (talk) 05:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. qedk (t 桜 c) 07:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. qedk (t 桜 c) 16:05, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, I'm Whisperjanes. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nakhon Ratchasima shootings, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whisperjanes (talk) 07:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2020
Hello, I'm Aloha27. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2020 Nova Scotia attacks, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Aloha27  talk  19:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2020
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 17:55, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2020
Hello, I'm Love of Corey. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2020 Nova Scotia attacks, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The same goes with the 2007 Colorado YWAM and New Life shootings article. Love of Corey (talk) 12:49, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Red Lake shootings, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Love of Corey (talk) 04:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Steyr SSG 69, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 13:10, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Luby's shooting, you may be blocked from editing. Fire9600 (talk) 16:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2021 San Jose shooting. Love of Corey (talk) 18:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 Vienna attack. jp×g 21:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

As you no doubt expected, you have been blocked from editing again, for continuing the same kind of editing that led to your previous block. Naturally, this time the block is for a significantly longer period. JBW (talk) 21:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

November 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2011 Seal Beach shooting, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The same goes for other Wikipedia articles. Severglue (talk) 22:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1000 days for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.